He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. Real news, real hope. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. What the Bleep Do We Know!? So what constitutes quantum quackery? . With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. 1. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. asks nothing but . Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. That's why we experience a classical world. Q: You do see that in some science . William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? (stylized as What t #$*! Beyond fear, beyond anger. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. So does classical physics. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. Consciousness must be involved. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? Do we know" . Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . contact customer service Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). The Christian Science Monitor has expired. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. And wait-the human body is mostly water! Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! It's there. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Your subscription to Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Down The Rabbit Hole\". Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. Wow, indeed! I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. 2. Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. We One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" What the Bleep!? Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? It's certainly not. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' Not everything is possible. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! We'll never know. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. The observer can't be ignored." This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. What the Bleep Do We Know!? "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. 2. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). A: Of course it does. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. That's not always true, but it's often true. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." You can't change the world by thinking about it. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Answer: Photographer. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Science Monitor has expired. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . What the Bleep Do We Know? Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. and published a study guide. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. 34 talking about this. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. It's there. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. for only $16.05 $11/page. Not exactly, Amit. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. That's its claim anyway. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing.