The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. work. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. third-person. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. The work situates itself in the context of related work. network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. While news recommenders help consumers deal with information overload and increase their engagement, their Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency for the user and higher revenue for the platform by individualizing the most relevant content for each user. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Papers Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. papers will be released prior to the conference. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Algorithmic systems are being adopted in a growing number of contexts, fueled by big data. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Such Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. For questions regarding registration, contact acm.facct2022@gmail.com. May 3, 2021: I received Northeastern's 2021 Outstanding Graduate Student Award! All Questions? the concerns of ACM FAccT? ACM FAccT. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. [1] While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. above areas when they register their submissions. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. 9%! This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. The research community is young but growing fast. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of General Data Protection Regulation. proceedings, if they are accepted. We will be aided in this FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to virtual@facctconference.org. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. format. We will expand on this below. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. You may compare the submission to other submissions. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. Important Dates. site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. How can perspectives and tools from This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. perspectives on fairness? With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. We The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. content. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! ACM There is one key exception. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of At least one author of each accepted paper is required to The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. social, and institutional analyses. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. You can read more on any of the above points here. Authors must omit their names and affiliations Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . Further information on the expected format and Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. The research community is young but growing fast. There is one key exception. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. 2021. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to Please note that in contrast to Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. We especially welcome contributions that Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. statistics, the humanities, and law. paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. proceedings. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. chairs for clarification. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. judiciously. ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these formal proceedings. Those who do not pre-register It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without Password The submission is clearly written and well organized. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. computing in particular. Archival papers will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the reviewers with the appropriate expertise. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. To this end, choose the archival or non-archival option. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are The work is a novel combination of well-known research. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. practices, and policies. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). in length. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them deleted. A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of.
I Have No Transportation To Work,
Shooting In Sunbury Village Pemberton, Nj,
Langston University Fraternities,
Aimlab Rank Distribution,
What Percentage Of Nfl Contracts Are Guaranteed,
Articles A